Anti-plagiarism

All the articles submitted for review in the TecnoHumanismo Journal are inspected by a disciplined anti-plagiarism policy that ensures their originality. To do this, the texts are analyzed using the Turnitin anti-plagiarism service in search of coincidences of texts and information from other authors, in addition to the correct use of the citation rules contemplated by APA, thus respecting the rights of other authors and guaranteeing that the works are unpublished. and that they comply with editorial quality standards that endorse scientific production.

Authors Responsibilities

The authors of the articles sent to TecnoHumanismo certify that the work is original and unpublished, that it does not contain parts of other authors or works already published by the authors. In addition, they confirm the authenticity of the data and that they have not been altered.

The author must not publish articles in which the same results are repeated in more than one scientific journal or other academic or other publication. The simultaneous proposal to multiple scientific journals of the same work is considered ethically incorrect and reprehensible.

The author must always provide the correct indication of the sources and contributions mentioned in the article.

The authors guarantee the inclusion of people who have contributed scientifically and intellectually in the conceptualization and planning of the work as well as in the interpretation of the results and in the writing of the same. At the same time, the order of appearance of the authors is ranked according to their level of responsibility and involvement.

In case the Editorial Board considers it appropriate, the authors of the articles must also make available the sources or data on which the research is based, which can be kept for a reasonable period of time after publication and possibly made accessible. .

All authors are required to explicitly declare that there are no conflicts of interest that may have influenced the results obtained or the proposed interpretations. Authors must also indicate any funding from agencies and/or projects from which the research article arises.

When an author identifies an error in his article, he must immediately inform the editors of the journal and provide all the necessary information to make the pertinent corrections. The responsibility for the content of the articles published in the TecnoHumanismo Journal rests exclusively with the authors.

Reviewer Commitments

Peer review is a procedure that helps editors to make decisions about proposed articles and also allows the author to improve the quality of articles submitted for publication. The reviewers assume the commitment to carry out a critical, honest, constructive and unbiased review of both the scientific quality and the literary quality of the writing in the field of their knowledge and skills.

The reviewer who does not feel competent in the topic to be reviewed or who cannot finish the evaluation in the scheduled time, should immediately notify the editors. The reviewers undertake to evaluate the works in the shortest possible time to respect the delivery deadlines, since in TecnoHumanismo the custody limits of pending manuscripts are limited and inflexible out of respect for the authors and their works.

Each assigned manuscript must be considered confidential. Therefore, these texts should not be discussed with other people without the express consent of the editors. Challengeable.

Peer review should be done objectively. The reviewers are obliged to give sufficient reasons for each of their evaluations, always using the review template. Reviewers will submit a full critical report with appropriate references per TecnoHumanismo review protocol and public policy for reviewers; especially if it is proposed that the work be rejected. They are required to notify editors if substantial parts of the work have already been published or are under review for another publication.

The reviewers undertake to accurately indicate the bibliographical references of fundamental works possibly forgotten by the author. The reviewer must also inform the editors of any similarities or overlaps of the manuscript with other published works.

To guarantee that the review process is as objective, impartial and transparent as possible, the identity of the authors is suppressed before the papers are sent for peer review. If it happens that for any reason the identity of the authors, their institutional affiliations or any other data that puts the anonymity of the document at risk, the reviewer must immediately notify the editors.