Exogenous factors in the profitability assessment of investment projects for road management

Authors

  • José Wilfredo Gutiérrez Lazares Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima - Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53673/th.v2i4.204

Keywords:

exogenous factors, profitability, management

Abstract

In recent years, of the 31 Public Private Associations (APP), developed by the MTC, more than 100 addenda have been accepted. Only in 15 road APPs, they presented more than 60 addenda; Of which 22 corresponded to the Initiative for the Integration of the South American Regional Infrastructure (IIRSA) due to problems of landslides and soil erosion, not foreseen in the project. That is why by integrating exogenous factors into the methodology for evaluating the profitability of investment projects, synergies and hierarchies are determined that shorten the gap between projected and executed costs. For this reason, the profitability of these projects, evaluated on the invierte.pe platform, (formerly SNIP) using financial factors such as VAN and IRR, but does not consider exogenous actors in the area of influence such as rain, forests, soils, populations, etc., that affect the social profitability of the project. In addition, the unmeasured factors are not manageable during the execution and service time of the work.

References

Bustos F. E. (2001). La importancia del teorema de suficiencia de Kuhn-Tucker en la tarea de decisiones organizacionales. https://www.angelfire.com/ak6/publicaciones/kuhn_tucker.pdf

Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1957). Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. Management science, 4(1), 38-91. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.4.1.38

Corporación Andina de Fomento (CAF) y el Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID). “Metodología de Evaluación Ambiental y Social con Enfoque Estratégico”. (EASE-IIRSA, 2007).

Egusquiza Velásquez, K. L. (2019). Determinación del riesgo de erosión hídrica en la cuenca alta del río Rímac, durante el Fenómeno El Niño 2016-2017. https://repositorio.continental.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12394/5376

Gómez Delgado, M., Cano, B., & Ignaciocoaut, J. (2006). “Sistemas de información geográfica y evaluación multicriterio en la ordenación del territorio” (No. 910.285 G65).

Hernández S. Alain, León S. María, Casas V. Mayra (2008). “Valoración Económico - Ambiental de los Recursos Forestales basada en Técnicas de decisión Multicriterio. Estudio de caso: Parque Nacional Viñales, Pinar del Río”. Foro Virtual de Contabilidad Ambiental y Social – 2008. Buenos Aires. https://www.economicas.uba.ar/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Hernandez_Santoyo_Valoracion_economico_ambiental.pdf

Koopmans, T. C. (1951). An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. Activity analysis of production and allocation.

Kuhn, H. W., & Tucker, A. W. (1951). Nonlinear programming, in (J. Neyman, Ed.) Proc. Berkeley Symp. Mathematical Statistics Probability, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Plan Intermodal de Transportes 2005. Ministerio de Transportes y Comunicaciones. Lima, diciembre 2005. Fuente: Provias Nacional.

Saaty, T. L. (1995). Transport planning with multiple criteria: the analytic hierarchy process applications and progress review. Journal of advanced transportation, 29(1), 81-126. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/atr.5670290109

Published

2023-02-09

How to Cite

Gutiérrez Lazares, J. W. (2023). Exogenous factors in the profitability assessment of investment projects for road management. Tecnohumanismo, 2(4), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.53673/th.v2i4.204