Classical and Bayesian analysis on the rectangular beta distribution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53673/th.v1i5.38Keywords:
Classical Bayesian analysis, Rectangular beta distribution model, extreme values, Monte Carlo simulationsAbstract
This paper deals with the problem of working with data expressed in proportions that contain extreme values. The general objective of the study was to study the properties, estimate and apply to real data the Beta Rectangular distribution model, which has been specifically built to carry out the statistical analysis of data expressed in proportions that contain extreme values. The study was carried out from the classical and Bayesian point of view. For the implementation of the Bayesian inference, Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations were considered. In order to evaluate the robustness of the Beta Rectangular distribution model, it was compared with the Beta distribution model both by classical inference and by Bayesian inference, and simulation studies were carried out under different scenarios generated by variations in the value of the parameters. of the distribution. Simulation studies have shown that the Beta Rectangular distribution model is more robust than the Beta distribution model. In the complementary case, that is, when the data does not include extreme values, there is an alternation between the Beta Rectangular and Beta models in relation to which of them best fits the data. It is concluded that the Beta Rectangular distribution model presents adequate properties to work with data sets expressed in proportions, restricted to the interval [0, 1] of the real line, and that present extreme values. When this situation occurs, the Beta Rectangular distribution model has a better fit to the data than the Beta distribution model.
References
Bayes, C., Bazán, J. y García, C. (2012). A new regression model for proportions,
Bayesian Analysis
Congdon, P. (2003). Applied-Bayesian-Modelling, John Wiley & Sons.
Ferrari, S. y Cribari-Neto, F. (2004). Beta regression for modelling rates and
proportions, Journal of Applied Statistics 31: 799–815.
Hahn, E. (2008). Mixture densities for project managment activity times: A robust
approac to pert, European Journal of Operational Research 188: 450–459.
INEI (2011a). Mejoras metodológicas para la medici´on de la pobreza, Reporte técnico,
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática, Perú.
Mira, A. (2005). Mcmc methods to estimate bayesian parametric models, Handbook of
Statistic 25: 415–436.
R Development Core Team (2011). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical
Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N. G. y Lunn, D. (2004). WinBUGS User
Manual Version 1.4.1. http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs.
Sturtz, S., Ligges, U. y Gelman, A. (2005). R2winbugs: A package for running
winBUGS from R, Journal of Statistical Software 12(3): 1–16. http://www.jstatsoft.org.
Tomohiro, A. (2010). Bayesian Model Selection and Statistical Modeling, CRC Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Luis Humberto Chia Ramírez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license allows others to redistribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even with commercial penalties, as long as you take credit for the original creation. This is the most helpful license offered. Recommended for maximum dissemination and use of the materials subject to the license.